Program development tools

Linx is a low code IDE and server. IT pros use Linx to quickly create custom automated business processes, integrate applications, expose web services and to efficiently handle high workloads.

GeneXus provides a unique platform that captures the needs of users and generates applications for present and future technologies, without the need to learn new technology. Allows pragmatic developers to evolve quickly, responding to market and technological changes in an agile way. Kite is Software Development tools that automatically completes multiple line codes. This editor supports more than 16 languages.

It helps you to code faster with no hassle. NFTS permission management tool configures the domain access, user account, and domain access permissions and is applied to network drives, files, and folders. It is one of the best application development tools that allows developing desktop, mobile and web applications. Cloud9 IDE is an online integrated software development environment.

Zend Studio allows software developers to code faster, debug more easily. It is one of the best developer tools which scales according to the DPI settings of the underlying operating system. Atom is a solid all-around text-editor. It is fully free and open source. This software development tool can be customized to do anything but without a need of modifying the config file. Codelobster streamlines and simplifies PHP software development.

CodeCharge Studio offers the fastest way to build applications. This tool helps to develop data-driven Web sites or enterprise Internet and Intranet systems. It is one of the best software programming tools that has many in-builds components, which you can easily drag and drop to assemble responsive web pages. HTML5 Builder is a software solution for building the web and mobile apps. It helps to target multiple mobile operating systems, devices and Web browsers.

Visual Studio Online is a collection of services. It is fast and easy to plan, build and ship software across a variety of platforms. The program curriculum mapping information is entered into Appendix C — Program Maps in Template 1 and where indicated in other applicable templates. At the Intermediate Level Phase, program developers need to assess whether the proposed program involves mandatory or voluntary regulatory requirements and must identify the names of regulatory bodies in Appendix D.

It is then possible to begin working towards completing the form and obtaining supporting documentation required for Final Level approval. The Curriculum Administrator may be contacted for guidance, if the distinction between mandatory and voluntary is unclear. This documentation is forwarded to CVS along with supporting documentation i. Furthermore, the revised MTCU Request for Approval for Funding Form specifically stipulates that: The program content and delivery is and will be compliant with all requirements of regulatory bodies responsible for the field of study or other regulatory bodies related to the field of study.

Please list all applicable mandatory and those voluntary regulatory bodies considered relevant to the program. Submissions require the completion of the appropriate template selected under the Templates and Forms link.

These checklists are available under the Supporting Resources link. Program developers must have their proposal reviewed by their assigned curriculum consultant and incorporate feedback and guidance, as appropriate, into the document prior to presenting the proposal to PRC. Once consultation with the curriculum consultant confirms readiness to proceed to an Intermediate Level PRC presentation, the appropriate template with the required components completed is to be submitted to the Executive Assistant to the Senior Vice President Academic, a minimum of one-week prior to the scheduled PRC meeting date on which the proposal will be presented.

The PRC Meeting Schedule should be reviewed well ahead of time to determine the preferred date to bring the proposal forward for an Intermediate Level review. The curriculum consultant guides developers in completing the template and in preparing for an Intermediate Level presentation. Prior to the meeting PRC members receive the program proposal and prepare comments and questions. The presentation to PRC requires that the chair and program developers provide a high level overview of the development undertaken to date in approximately minutes.

Following the presentation, PRC members have an opportunity to ask questions or seek clarification throughout a systematic review of the proposal submission, which typically takes an additional 15 minutes, depending on the complexity of the proposal. During the presentation for Intermediate Approval, program developers can generally expect to receive direction on:. At the conclusion of an Intermediate Level presentation, and following Committee questions, the PRC Chair will ask the Committee for a recommendation for approval at the level deemed appropriate based on the presentation and status of the program proposal development.

Typically, the approval sought is at the Intermediate Level, unless during the presentation it is identified that required elements for Intermediate Level approval are not sufficiently developed. Alternatively, in exceptional circumstances, the program developers may have advanced the proposal beyond the Intermediate Level requirements, to justify consideration for Final Level approval. Feedback to the program developers and identified action items are intended to be constructive and must be incorporated in the final proposal in order to expedite program approval.

The PRC scrutiny ensures that program proposals present professionally and include all necessary components that conform to College, CVS and Ministry requirements. Program proposal developers benefit from the individual expertise of PRC members and the many sets of eyes reviewing the proposal. Throughout the program proposal development and approval processes, program delivery expectations and associated planning must remain at the forefront. This planning is necessary to ensure that the program delivery will not lead to unforeseen facility or resource needs.

Likewise, program delivery scheduling must be well planned. If an online program is being proposed with a residency component, a planning exercise must be undertaken that outlines the full delivery schedule including residency periods.

Any residency or non-traditional delivery requirements need to be clearly articulated in program publications.

Formal applicant and employment demand analyses are required for all Ontario college credential programs. Results of the labour market and applicant demand analyses are included in the final program proposal within Template 1, or where otherwise indicated, if applicable, in other templates. There may be other information from the report that is also important to highlight. Another option is to append the entire report to the proposal. For all Ontario college credential programs there are specific requirements related to the advisory committee that must be included in a Final Level program proposal.

For College certificates these are desirable though not essential. The requirements are noted within Section 2. These steps in the program development process should be initiated as soon as possible after Intermediate Level PRC approval. They should occur concurrently with final program proposal development and be reflected within the submission and where indicated, if applicable, within other templates.

The space requirements for the proposed program will be reviewed in detail in order to:. Consideration must be given to any instructional or infrastructure technology requirements. If the program is intending to use mobile learning strategies, these must be identified. Similarly, any specialized software requirements must be noted. A discussion with a College librarian is to take place to identify start-up and possible resource material requirements.

These are to be noted within Template 1 for all college programs and where indicated, if applicable, within other templates. In addition, the statement should be appended to the proposal. Submissions require the completion of the appropriate template selected under the Key Documents — Templates and Forms link. These checklists are available under the Program Development — Supporting Resources link. Once consultation with the curriculum consultant confirms readiness to proceed to a Final Level PRC presentation, the appropriate template along with all required components completed are to be submitted to the Executive Assistant to the Senior Vice President Academic, a minimum of one-week prior to the scheduled PRC meeting date on which the proposal is to be presented.

The PRC Meeting Schedule should be reviewed well ahead of time to determine the preferred date to bring the proposal forward for a Final Level review. A good approach is to highlight how each of the action items identified at the Intermediate Level presentation have since been addressed, and the further development that has occurred. PRC members will have received a copy of the Final Level program proposal and will have reviewed it prior to the meeting.

Following the presentation by program developers, the PRC Chair will provide Committee members an opportunity to ask questions or seek clarification throughout a systematic review of the proposal submission which typically takes an additional minutes, depending on the nature of the proposal. Feedback from PRC members depends on the nature of the program presented and is intended to advance the development of a particular program.

Following a Final Level presentation, program developers can generally expect to receive verbal direction on:. At the conclusion of a Final Level presentation, and following Committee questions, the Chair will ask the PRC Committee for a recommendation for program development approval at the level deemed appropriate based on the presentation and status of the program proposal development. Typically, the approval granted will be at the Final Level, pending completion of action items, unless during the presentation it is identified that required elements for Final Level approval are not sufficiently developed.

In this case, the recommendation will be that the designation of Intermediate Level approval remain. Program developers should recognize that feedback provided is intended to be constructive. The intent is to facilitate program approval in an expeditious manner.

For guidance on a required program modification, refer to the Curriculum Modifications Guidelines and Template 3 — Program Modification. This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. Ready to up your game with nTask? Book a Demo Try For Free. X We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Cookie Policy Accept. Manage consent. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website.

Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.

Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".

It does not store any personal data. Functional Functional. Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features. Performance Performance. Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Analytics Analytics. Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Advertisement Advertisement. Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads. Others Others. Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

Email Address Enter valid email.